Introduction to HCX*
Introduction to Health Claims Data Exchange
The Health Claims data Exchange can be envisioned as analogous to the internet in general and email exchange networks more specifically, where data packets travel to and fro between an origin and the destination. In this context, Health Claims Data Exchanges can be thought of as routing switches or email gateways that facilitate communication with the desired level of consistency, security, privacy, and durability. However, unlike the internet or email, this protocol is defined for a specialized use case of exchanging claims-related information between relevant actors - payors, providers, beneficiaries, regulators, observers.
The figure below shows a simple depiction of a health claims network facilitated by an HCX instance:
Vision, Mission, and Objectives
Expand Benefits/Coverage Penetration
Significantly lower cost of claims processing thereby facilitating new use cases, including OPD use cases such as consultation, diagnostics, pharmacy, wellness etc.
New kinds of payors in the market that can lead to an increase in insured base
Reduce receivable cycles and increase acceptance of cashless health claims (at smaller providers, other health service providers)
Facilitate Benefits/Coverage innovation
Highly personalized policies
Short duration, low premium policies
Auto adjudication, better fraud and abuse prevention
Simplify and bring efficiency to claims processing :
Standardized claims process, less operational overheads
Increase trust among payers and providers through a transparent, rule-based mechanism
Better patient experience
Key Use cases/Workflows
The current version of specifications are designed to cater to both cashless & reimbursement health claims processes and envisions to facilitate the following information flows:
Network Participant details - addressing, data security and integrity certs
Eligibility check
Pre-authorization (including enhancements)
Claims request flow (discharge/settlement)
Requesting & sharing additional information about claims
Additional supporting information
Policyholder consent to process claim on their behalf, etc.
Notifications (including network, participant & workflow related notifications)
Status check
Fetch data for regulatory compliance, etc.
Payment notification
Payment acknowledgement
Key Constituents
The claims network will consist of the following key building blocks:
Specifications - this layer defines the blueprint for different aspects of the claims network. These include communication protocols, data packet specifications, Taxonomies, privacy and security specifications, network policies (onboarding and de-boarding rules), business rules, operational specifications, etc. Please note that the document intentionally calls these artefacts as specifications to indicate that they become standards only after a “de jure” or “de facto” adoption by the ecosystem.
Reference Health Claims Exchange (aka switch) software - A reference gateway implementation build as per the standards defined above. The main goal here will be to provide fundamental software building blocks of the network to enable faster adoption by the ecosystem.
Compliance sandbox - Implemented using the above reference software, the key goal of the sandbox will be to help the ecosystem test its specific components against the network standards defined above and get certified to become part of the network.
Health Claim Exchange runtime(s) - Operating instances of the health claims platform that enable real-world claims interactions on the network. Like with the internet and email example, there can be multiple such running instances that are expected to be interoperable by adhering to the standards defined as in #1 above.
Participating systems - These are digital systems of the network participants (Payers, Providers, Regulators, Observers, etc.) that sit on the edges of the claims network and initiate/receive the communication happening through the network. These would be analogous to client/servers in the internet analogy and various email service providers in the email analogy.
The following sections describe the key aspects of the proposed open specifications including design principles, a list of key specifications, proposed governance and details of technology and domain specifications work completed so far.
HCX specifications could enable the existence of multiple HCX instances and relays between them (please see example flow here).
Approach
Protocol specifications form the bedrock of the envisioned claims network's success. To achieve this, these specifications must garner consensus among a diverse array of healthcare system stakeholders, serving as the shared foundation upon which the network is built. In pursuit of this goal, we advocate for a community-driven, open, and consultative approach to protocol creation and governance.
This comprehensive approach, encompassing governance principles, design principles, and the proposed governance approach, is defined in the "Governance" section of the protocol website.
Key Specifications
This section lists key types of specification needed for Health Claims data exchange.
Technical Specifications
Like HTTP or SMTP, open protocol (Health Claims data Transfer Protocol) for claims exchange will define the following key aspects:
Authentication (Payer, Provider, Regulator, Observer, ...)
Request/response message syntax - header and header attributes, optional body, mandatory vs optional, transport constraint on the messages, etc.
Supported methods (APIs)
Communication mode (synchronous or asynchronous nature of APIs)
Response codes
Data security and privacy considerations: Security, authenticity, and non-repudiability aspects of message exchange
Encryption of certain parts of message for transport security (beyond SSL on Health Claims data exchange)
Message signing protocol for verifiability and non-repudiation
Sequence of interactions
In addtion, Technical specifications may include the following types of technical operations policies:
Key rotation requirements
Segregation of duties and responsibilities within various teams of exchange operators
Operational reports and dashboards
Audit checklist and frequency
Domain Specifications
Specifications about format and definition of domain specific elements. A lot of these may be adopted from existing domain standards like FHIR, SNOMED, ICD-10-PCS. In the context of claims data exchange few key focus areas will be:
Domain data model - Schema definition of domain entities like Coverage Eligibility, Claims, Providers, Payers, Policies, etc. FHIR specifications from HL7 have been adopted by the HCX community to define domain entities.
Metadata specifications - Metadata is data that describes data, data associated with an object, a document, or a dataset for the purposes of description, administration, technical functionality, and preservation. In the context of claims, this would mainly involve coding systems and value sets for key claim attributes, such as disease codes, procedure codes, diagnostic codes, billing codes (product or service e.g. room rent, ICU charges), etc.
Domain-Specific Language(s) - These may be developed when the attributes of the entity are different from use case to use case, but they need to follow some common rules/characteristics, like the types of data elements it can have. It essentially helps define the needed Data Models in a particular domain. The HCX community has investigated and found that combination and extension of the FHIR resources suffices for the currently envisioned use cases, and therefore has not felt a need to define any DSL as of now. The DSL option is included here as a possible option if a need ever arises for future use cases.
Business Policy Specifications
A thriving data exchange will also require clear rules of engagement to ensure trust from all actors. These specifications will involve guidelines around:
Onboarding policies - How does any entity get on board on the data exchange? Adherence to protocol, the process for a compliance review, frequency of compliance review, etc
De-boarding policies: What makes an entity to be blocked or ejected from the data exchange. Things like adherence to technical SLAs, non-compliance with expected protocol versions, message security or privacy violations, etc.
Access control policies (Data sharing policies) - which actor plays what role and gets to see which parts of the data. These policies will then affect the visibility and access to domain-specific attributes that will typically travel in the body of the data structures defined by the data exchange. Role-based, need for consent to access APIs, data attributes, etc.
Business SLAs : Determine the service level agreements (SLAs) to be adhered by the participants.
Charges/Fees - these would be policies around charges various data exchange entities will be allowed to levy on others depending on the role they play
Dispute resolution policies
Service rating policies - that would be the parameters and mechanisms to rate each type of actor on the data exchange.
The next sections detail the protocol specifications under these three key areas (Technical, Domain and Business Policy).
Last updated
